M11 - TERJEMAHAN VIDEO (6)
6. Definisi Operasional & Organisasi Kajian (bab 1) #
JomTulisTesis
Bab 1 seterusnya, kita pergi 1.8
iaitu definisi operasional. Ok ini agak sukar ye, kadang-kadang pelajar ni dia
agak keliru. Operasional bermakna tentang definisi kajian yang kita jalankan.
Bukan definisi konsep, bukanlah definisi macam contoh pelajar buat, apa makna
wacana, 1. Apa makna skrip 1, tekstual 1, animasi 1, cerita 1, rakyat 1, Melayu
1. Itu salah ya, kita bukan nak definisi itu. Kalau definisi tiap-tiap satu,
pelajar akan rujuk kamus dewan sahaja dan semua jenis kamus. Jangan! Jadi
operasional ialah tentang kajian kita. Biasanya definisi operasional ini
minimum 2 dan paling maksimum 3, tentang bagaimana kita nak jalankan kajian ini
supaya bila pembaca baca baru faham , ohh ini maksud dia. Jadi kalau kita
tengok tajuk ini, kita boleh ambil 1 wacana tekstual, lagi 1 skrip animasi
cerita rakyat Melayu. Kalau kita nak ambil bezakan skrip animasi tiada kaitan
pula. Jadi kita boleh teruskan, untuk tajuk ini mungkin ada dua. Tajuk yang lain
mungkin ada tiga. Kalau kita ambil tajuk daripada kejuruteraan contohnya,
mungkin operasional ada banyak sebab banyak pemboleh ubahnya. Kalau daripada
tesis Sains pun begitu, ada banyak pemboleh ubah yang membolehkan kita membuat
definisi operasional supaya pemeriksa faham apa kaitan itu dengan tesis
tersebut. Kalau kita tengok tesis dalam bentuk ekonomi juga begitu. Ada
banyak pemboleh ubah, mungkin lebih dari
3. Jadi untuk yang ini, kita fokus kepada 2, awak boleh buat begini kemudian
letak contohnya, wacana tekstual tetapi wacana tekstual yang awak nak buat
definisi operasional ini mesti berkaitan dengan kajian. Pastikan bahawa ambil
dan perlu ada rujukan. Ada satu cara, 1 maknanya awak buat wacana tekstual,
berkaitan dengan kajian awak. Wacana tekstual yang berfokus kepada skrip
animasi, wacana tekstual ini akan dianalisis dengan menggunakan 3 elemen.
Contoh 3 elemen ini iaitu kandungan, konteks dan andaian. Jadi menurut
Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), wacana tekstual apa dia apa dia, bolehlah ada rujukan
dan juga 1.8.2 iaitu skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu. Ini perlulah berkaitan
dengan kajian awak, huraikan serba ringkas. Skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu
terdiri daripada 20 cerita, sebab dalam tesis yang dianalisis 20 cerita. Jadi
skrip animasi ini berbentuk apa dia, huraian. Mungkin yang ini skrip animasi
cerita rakyat Melayu awak huraikan berkaitan dengan kajian kita, tak ada pula
rujukan, tak apa boleh diterima sebab definisi ini berkaitan dengan kajian
awak. Jadi ada 2 cara, satu cara, mempunyai rujukan, ini ada rujukan, ini ada
rujukan. Yang kedua, tiada rujukan, maknanya awak buat huraian. Huraian wacana
tekstual itu dari segi konteks awak punya tesis. Jadi tiada rujukan, dua-dua
boleh diterima. Tetapi macam saya katakan sebelum ini, rujuk penyelia. Kalau
penyelia kata ada rujukan, letak rujukan. Kalau penyelia kata tak apa, saya
percaya kalau tak ada rujukan pun saya faham dan ini sebenarnya tidak perlu
rujukan kerana berkaitan dengan rujukan awak. Pun boleh diterima. Kita berbeza
pendapat, berbeza sekolah jadi different school of taught jadi pemikiran kita
berbeza. Jadi kalau ada 1 juta penyelia, ada 1 juta pemikiran yang berbeza.
Terpulang kepada penyelia. Macam saya
kalau saya kata tak perlu kerana berkaitan dengan kajian bagaimana awak nak jalankan
kajian nama pun operasional, operation. Kalau ada rujukan, pastikan tidak boleh
rujuk kamus. Dah kenapa nak rujuk kamus. Kena rujuk kajian-kajian, bukan kamus.
Menurut Kamus Bahasa Dewan Edisi Keempat, wacana tekstual ialah blab la bla tak
boleh, itu kita pun tahu. Jangan rujuk kamus. Jadi, kita rujuk kajian daripada
orang lain. Satu boleh rujukan, kedua ada rujukan pun boleh diterima, terpulang
kepada penyelia masing-masing. Kalau penyelia kata ada, terimalah, perlu akur
kata penyelia. Jadi kita lihat, kita teruskan iaitu 1.9 iaitu organisasi
kajian. Organisasi kajian ini sebenarnya terpulang kepada
individu/pelajar/penyelia. Selalunya saya akan suruh pelajar PhD untuk letak
organisasi kajian, kadang-kadang pelajar Master pun boleh, tak letak pun boleh,
jika perlu. Organisasi kajian ini awak buat dalam bentuk perenggan. Jadi
perenggan pertama, apa ada dalam bab 1, kemudian perenggan kedua apa ada bab 2,
kita nak buat secara ringkas organisasi kita supaya apabila penyelia baca, ohh
bab 1 ada ini rupanya. Penyusunan tesis kita secara teratur, jadi
perenggan-perenggan dalam ringkasan sahaja. Kerana tiap-tiap pengenalan dalam
bab dah katakan dah, tetapi dalam organisasi kajian ini kita kena nyatakanlah
secara ringkas apa yang ada. Pelajar PhD memang saya wajibkan supaya dia
sendiri boleh faham kajian dia tiap-tiap bab. Kalau pelajar Master nak buat
boleh, tak buat pun tak pe. Bacelor pun sama, pelajar Diploma pun tiada masalah
jika nak buat terpulang kepada penyelia. Akhir sekali, 1.10 baru masuk kesimpulan,
semua bab mesti ada kesimpulan. Tidak ada kesimpulan tidak boleh, kita nak
simpulkan apa yang ada dalam bab tersebut. Saya dapati ada tesis yang tidak ada
kesimpulan, tergantung tiba-tiba dah masuk bab 2. Jadi tidak ada kesinambungan
bab 1 dengan bab 2. Macam bab 1 ada bab lain , macam ada entiti lain pula.
Tidak ada kaitan pula dengan bab 2. Kita kena ada kesimpulan, simpulkan apa
yang ada dalam bab 1. Ingat ayat akhir, kita kena letak kaitkan dengan bab
seterusnya iaitu bab 2 akan membincangkan sorotan kajian... barulah kita lihat
ada kesinambungan antara bab 1 dengan bab 2. Serupa juga dengan bab-bab lain.
Akhir kesimpulan mesti nyatakan apa ada dalam bab seterusnya. Kadang-kadang ada
penyelia kata tidak perlu kerana pemikiran berbeza. Bila berbeza kita redha dan
terima. Kita dah habis bab 1, lupa nak cakap halaman. Berapa halaman bab 1 ya
Prof? Halaman bab 1 lebih kurang 8-10 sahaja. Itu yang saya kata bahaya kerana
ada pelajar letak sampai 30 sebab masalah kajian sahaja sudah 15 halaman.
Masalah kajian kita ambil yang betul-betul penting sahaja. Masalah kajian
terlalu panjang lebar bersemangat sangat sampai 15 halaman, dah jadi salah.
Permasalahan kajian fokuskan ikut objektif. Objektif ada 2, 2 perengganlah
permasalahan kajian tetapi padat walaupun ringkas. Yang selebihnya sorotan dan
jurang pada bab 2. Paling lebih pun 12, tetapi jangan kurang 8. Tetapi jangan
lebih 15 takut seperti bab 2 sebab pemeriksa akan potong-potong. Jadi, kita
ingat ya dalam bab 1 ini.
TERJEMAHAN BAHASA INGGERIS
6. Definition of
Operational & Study Organization (Chapter 1) #LetsWriteAThesis
Next, in chapter 1 we go to 1.8
which is the operational definition. Ok this is a bit difficult, sometimes
student is a bit confused. Operational means about the definition of the study
we conduct. Not the definition of the concept, not the definition of a sample
of students do, what the meaning of the passage, 1. What does 1 script, 1 textual,
1 animation, 1 story, 1 people. Its worng, we do not want that definition. If
the definition of each one, students will refer to the whole dictionary only
and all types of dictionaries. Don't! So operational is about our study.
Usually this operational definition is minimum 2 and maximum 3, about how we
want to conduct this study so that when the reader just reads, ohh this is what
he means. So if we look at this topic, we can take one of textual discourse,
yet one animation script Malay folklore. If we want to differentiate the
animated script, it has nothing to do. So we can go on, for this title there
may be two. Other titles may have three. If we take a title from engineering
for example, maybe operational there are many reasons for many variables. Even
if it is from a Science thesis, there are many variables that allow us to make
an operational definition so that the examiner understands what it has to do
with the thesis. If we look at the thesis in economic form, so is it. There are
many variables, maybe more than 3. So for this one, we focus on 2, you can do
this then put for example, textual discourse but the textual discourse you want
to make this operational definition must be related to the study. Make sure
that take and there should be a reference. There is one way, 1 means you create
a textual discourse, related to the study you. Textual discourse that focuses
on animated script, this textual discourse will be analyzed using 3 elements.
Examples of these 3 elements are content, context and assumptions. So according
Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019), textual discourse what is it, there may be references 1.8.2 and also
the animation script Malay folklore. This should be related to your study,
describe briefly. Malay folklore animation script consists of 20 stories,
because the thesis analyzed 20 stories. So this animated script is what it
looks like, description. Perhaps this animation script you describe Malay
folklore related to our study, there was no reference, not acceptable because
the definition of what is related to the review body. So there are 2 ways, one
way, have a reference, this has a reference, this has a reference. Secondly,
there is no reference, it means you make a description. The description of the
textual discourse in terms of the context you have a thesis. So no reference,
both are acceptable. But like I said before, consult a supervisor. If the
supervisor says there is a reference, place a reference. If the supervisor says
it's okay, I believe if there is no reference I understand and this actually
does not need a reference because it is related to your reference. Even
acceptable. We have different opinions, different schools so different schools
of taught so our thoughts are different. So if there are 1 million supervisors,
there are 1 million different thoughts. It is up to the supervisor. Like me if
I say it is not necessary because it is related to the study of how you want to
conduct a name study is operational, operation. If there is a reference, make
sure not to refer to the dictionary. Why do you want to refer to the
dictionary. Refer to the studies, not the dictionary. According to the Fourth
Edition Hall Language Dictionary, textual discourse is.... cannot, that we also
know. Do not refer to the dictionary. So, we refer to studies from others. One
can be a reference, the second there is a reference can be accepted, it depends
on the respective supervisor. If the supervisor says yes, accept, it is
necessary to comply with the supervisor's words. So we see, we proceed to 1.9 which
is the study organization. The organization of this study is actually up to the
individual / student / supervisor. Often I will ask PhD students to place a
study organization, sometimes even Master students can, not even place, if
necessary. The organization of this study you made in the form of paragraphs.
So the first paragraph, what is in chapter 1, then the second paragraph is what
is chapter 2, we want to make briefly our organization so that when the
supervisor reads, ohh chapter 1 there is this apparently. Organize our thesis
regularly, so the paragraphs are in summary only. Because every introduction in
the chapter has already been said, but in the organization of this study we
have to state briefly what is available. PhD student I do compel so that he
himself can understand his study every chapter. If the Master student wants to
do it, he can't do it. Bachelors also, even Diploma students have no problem if
they want to do it to the supervisor. Finally, 1.10 just came to a conclusion,
all chapters must have a conclusion. There is no conclusion cannot, we want to
conclude what is in the chapter. I found that there is a thesis that has no
conclusion, depending on the sudden entry of chapter 2. So there is no
continuation of chapter 1 with chapter 2. Like chapter 1 there is another
chapter, like there is another entity. It has nothing to do with chapter 2. We
have to have a conclusion, summarize what is in chapter 1. Remember the last
sentence, we have to put it in relation to the next chapter which is chapter 2
will discuss the highlights of the study ... then we see there is continuity
between chapter 1 with chapter 2. Similar to the other chapters. The end of the
conclusion must state what is in the next chapter. Sometimes there are
unnecessary word supervisors because of different thoughts. When different we
are satisfied and accept. We finished chapter 1, forgot to talk about the page.
How many pages of chapter 1 is Prof? Chapter 1 pages are about 8-10 only. That
is what I say is dangerous because there are students up to 30 because the
study problem alone is already 15 pages. The problem of the study we take is
really important only. The problem of the study is too long, it is very
enthusiastic up to 15 pages, so it is wrong. The problems of the study focus on
the objectives. The objective is to have 2, 2 paragraphs of the study problem
but concise even concise. The rest are highlights and gaps in chapter 2. At
least 12, but do not be less than 8. But do not be more than 15 afraid like
chapter 2 because the examiner will cut it. So, we have to remember this
chapter 1.
RUJUKAN
Pautan video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bANk-CrrhI&t=11s
SAYA SUDAH SUBSCRIBE!!
No comments:
Post a Comment